Record of the main hearing — P2.470/24, 2 April 2024
Source
This is a complete English translation of the two-page hearing record from the supplied photographs. The public PDF is a redacted copy; every occurrence of the plaintiff’s lawyer’s name is marked [redacted]. The judge, lay judges and court clerk remain named in their official roles.
The record gives a starting time of 08:15, postponement because the procedural conditions for holding the hearing were not met, and a closing time of 08:30. The plaintiff did not attend in person, his authorized representative did, and no one attended for the defendant; the case file did not show service of the defendant’s summons. The next hearing was scheduled for 24 April 2024 at 11:00. That date does not establish that the next hearing took place.
Publicly redacted two-page source PDF
PDF page 1 — Complete translation
P2.470/24
RECORD OF THE MAIN HEARING
Drawn up on 02. 04. 2024
before the Basic Court in Novi Sad
Presiding judge:
BOJANA VUJIĆ
Panel members — lay judges:
Pekić Stevan
Čiča Sofija
Court clerk:
TATJANA NIKOLIĆ
Plaintiff: PETROVIĆ MILAN
Defendant: CSR NOVI SAD
Subject of the dispute: [field not completed]
Start at 8:15 a.m.
The hearing is not public.
The presiding judge opens the main hearing, announces the subject to be heard and establishes that the following have appeared:
For the plaintiff: the plaintiff has not appeared; his authorized representative [redacted], a lawyer of Novi Sad, has appeared on his behalf.
For the defendant: no one; service is not shown.
Of the other summoned persons, the following have not appeared: [field not completed]
Standard form notice
*) In small-claims proceedings, in addition to the information under Article 118, paragraph 1, this record must contain:
- statements concerning the parties of greater significance, particularly those acknowledging the claim in whole or in part, waiving the claim or an appeal, or amending or withdrawing the claim;
- the essential substance of the evidence taken;
- decisions against which an appeal is permitted and which have been pronounced at the main hearing;
- whether the parties were present when the judgment was pronounced and, if present, whether they were instructed on the conditions under which they may lodge an appeal.
To enter the necessary information in the record under the Civil Procedure Act and the court’s practice, use the following blank pages of the record; if those are insufficient, add separate sheets as attachments.
PDF page 2 — Complete translation
It is established that the defendant has not appeared at the hearing and that service of the summons upon the defendant is not shown in the case file as at the date of the hearing.
Since the procedural conditions for holding the hearing are not met,
The panel makes the following
RULING
The hearing is postponed.
The next hearing is scheduled for:
24. 04. 2024 at 11:00 a.m.,
which the plaintiff’s authorized representative, who is present, acknowledges; therefore, no written summons will be sent to her. She also undertakes to inform her client of the date and time of the hearing, so no summons needs to be sent to her.
Summon the defendant in writing, enclosing the submissions dated 01. 04. 2024.
Completed at 8:30 a.m.
Court clerk — parties — presiding judge
[Printed page number: 2.]
Editorial note
This note is not part of the hearing record. The statement that service upon the defendant is not shown does not signify deliberate refusal to attend. The preprinted small-claims notice is reproduced as form text, not as an additional classification of these proceedings. The record contains no decision on the merits of the claim; it records postponement, the new hearing date, and directions for notification and summons.
Comments on source passages (7)
Bojana Vujić — non-public hearing record
The record names Bojana Vujić as presiding judge and expressly states that the hearing is not public. It records the procedural attendance and the panel’s postponement; the subsequent ruling is on page 2.
PDF p. 1
Open related document
Open timeline event
Plaintiff absent in person; counsel present
Milan Petrović has not appeared in person, but his authorized representative has appeared on his behalf. The record expressly distinguishes his personal absence from the presence of his representative.
PDF p. 1
Open related document
Open timeline event
CSR: no appearance; service not shown
The attendance entry records no one for the defendant CSR and says service is not shown. Page 2 then uses the missing proof of service as the reason why the procedural conditions for holding the hearing are not met.
PDF p. 1
Open related document
Open timeline event
ZPP — Article 118 · Reading and correcting the hearing record
The form’s printed reference to “particulars under Article 118(1)” does not match the current Act’s numbering. Those particulars are in Article 116(1), to which the current small-claims provision, Article 474, expressly refers. The printed numbering corresponds to Articles 118(1) and 473 of the 2004 Act. This is evidence of an outdated reference in the form; it does not establish that the court applied the former Act or classified this identity/adoption dispute as a small claim.
Civil Procedure Act (ZPP) · Article 118
ZPP — instruction for completing the record
This is the hearing form’s printed instruction to continue the record on blank pages and add sheets if needed. It describes how the form is to be completed; it does not establish that pages were omitted or that the hearing had no substantive content. No article is specified here.
Civil Procedure Act (ZPP)
Missing proof of service in the case file
Page 2 repeats the point as the reason for the panel’s procedural decision: service upon the defendant is not shown in the file as at the hearing date. The panel led by Bojana Vujić then records that the conditions for holding the hearing are not met and postpones it.
PDF p. 2
Open related document
Open timeline event
24 April: counsel must notify her client
The panel sets 24 April 2024 at 11:00. Counsel acknowledges the date and undertakes to notify her client; the record says no written summons will be sent to her. It separately directs that the CSR be summoned in writing with the 1 April submissions. These are different notification arrangements for the two sides.
PDF p. 2
Open related document
Open timeline event